They are the hip new accessory, watches that tell time, take step counts, monitor heartbeats, and now even text, George Jetson’s miraculous technology come to life. However, could these nifty devices be too distracting for drivers?
Distracted driving is quickly becoming a leading cause of automobile accidents in America. From texting to picture taking, phones are one of the biggest distractions in our highly plugged in lifestyle. Texting can take a driver’s eyes off the road for 5 seconds, enough time to miss someone merging into your lane, to miss a light changing, or to miss road hazards. But what about a wrist watch?
First, the laws regarding hand held devices while driving differ from state to state and country to country. In DC the law reads:
No person shall use a mobile telephone or other electronic device while operating a moving motor vehicle in the District of Columbia unless the telephone or device is equipped with a hands-free accessory.
But in Virginia the law is:
(If you’d like more information on your state’s laws on the matter click here.)
These laws can get very confusing for drivers crossing state lines or simply visiting a new area especially when they have such stark differences. In many states, only texting while driving is banned, but in 14 states all electronic use is banned unless they are hands-free. In every case however, the device is described as hand-held, which begs the question, do watches count?
Obviously technology is evolving too quickly for the laws to keep up but that hasn’t stopped police from interpreting the laws themselves. In Canada a man was charged $120 for using his Apple Watch while driving. The man stated that he was simply changing the song playing through his car’s Bluetooth speakers but the police felt that the very act of using an electronic device while driving was dangerous enough. Safety should be at the forefront of everyone’s mind but what criteria are police and legislators going to use to pick and choose their banned “electronic devices”, assuming they begin to change these distracted driving laws? An E-Cigarette is electronic, smart watches are obviously electronic, and with the advent of Google Glass last year, even glasses, corrective or fashionable, are becoming electronic.
It may seem overly cautious but smart watches have the capacity to be extremely distracting. Every time an email, text message, or even a “like” on Facebook or Instagram is received the watch will buzz on your wrist (this applies to most smart watches as even the Fitbit notifies the wearer of a text message on their phone). That small vibration will cut your focus on the road and cause you to look at the watch face. There’s almost a biological urge to read and answer whatever notification is coming through. Anything that causes a driver to look away from the road is cause for concern, and smart watches are too tempting to not be dangerous. Luckily, the technology in cars is also advancing, allowing the car to connect to the phone or electronic device to minimize any attention being diverted from the road. Now cars can change the song, can answer calls, and some can even use voice command for texting. Many cars with these capabilities have also begun to ban the voice command texting unless the car is in park. Remember, even Bluetooth can distract and should be used sparingly.
The true issue at hand is what will distract you when you drive? If your wrist buzzes once or maybe 15 times will you be tempted to look at the watch face while driving, or maybe at a red light? If yes, than that watch has become nothing more than a phone bangle, and should be properly stowed away, out of arms reach. You don’t need to read any message immediately, staying alive and safe is more important. Until the laws are more adequately defined, we, the drivers, must take safety and distraction into our own hands, or wrists. Interpret the laws for yourself and know yourself, for you don’t need a watch to read the car clock and you don’t need a step counter when you’re stationary.
Tom Curcio, the driving force behind Curcio Law, is a dedicated trial lawyer with more than 35 years of experience in Northern Virginia. He has dedicated his career to representing people who have been seriously injured through no fault of their own. He works tirelessly to obtain the compensation his clients are legally entitled to…
Rakin Hamad is a graduate of the George Mason Law School and joined Curcio Law as an associate in August 2018. Rakin works closely with Tom Curcio and staff in preparing cases from the initial client meeting through trial and has been a perfect fit for the firm. During law school, Rakin interned at the…
Julia Martinez, a Florida native, joined Curcio Law as a paralegal in 2013. She began her legal career in 1998 working at a personal injury firm that primarily handled automobile accidents, slip and falls, and products liability cases. Then, in 2008 she expanded her knowledge by working at two other law firms. She obtained her…
As the firm’s office manager, Kathy McAfee is dedicated to making sure the office runs smoothly and that the team has what it needs by way of resources, technology, and supplies to best serve our clients. Kathy graduated with a B.A. in Sociology from Roanoke College in 1986 and afterward, returned to Alexandria. She began…
Riann Winget, a native Texan, graduated with a BA in Psychology and a Minor in Legal Studies from the University of Pennsylvania in 2017. She was a member of the varsity soccer team, Chi Omega Sorority, and was on the university board for Big Brothers Big Sisters. After graduation, she joined AmeriCorps and taught preschool…
"$213,000.00 Jury Verdict, Auto Accident, Hand injury"
"$1,500,000.00, Auto Accident, Wrongful Death"
"$100,000.00, Auto Accident, Broken Leg"
"$493,000.00, Auto Accident, Brain injury, broken rib, facial lacerations"
"$190,000.00, Auto Accident, Brain injury"