Search Site
Menu

Discovery: Requests for Admission

You are injured in a car accident or a slip or trip and fall, and believe someone else is liable for your damages. Whether the driver of another vehicle crashed into you because they were texting or a business owner forgot to put up a hazard sign near a slippery surface, there are many instances where a defending party can and should be held liable for your personal injury.

Knowing this, when you can’t reach an appropriate settlement for that claim, you file a lawsuit. Now, you’re undergoing the discovery process–which is the pretrial phase when both sides gather crucial evidence and develop court strategies.

Written discovery, such as interrogatories and request for production of documents, and depositions are discovery tools that we have previously detailed in our blog. The next tool that can be used during the discovery phase of litigation is requests for admission.

What are Requests for Admission? 

The plaintiff, the party bringing the lawsuit, must prove everything they claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Requests for admission allows the plaintiff to narrow the issues that are actually in controversy and thereby determine the issues that the plaintiff must present evidence to prove at trial.  Requests for admission go both ways: you can submit requests to the defendant, and the defendant can submit requests to you.

Requests for admission are written as statements that must be admitted, denied, or objected to by the party that receives them. Requests for admission may relate to statements or opinions of fact or the application of the law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request.

Under Virginia Supreme Court Rule 4:11, the recipient of requests for admission must respond (admit, deny, or object) to the request within 21 days of it being served. Any request for admission that is not responded to within the 21 day period is considered admitted to and established as fact.

Sample Requests for Admission

Requests for admission can be used to get medical bills into evidence. For example, a plaintiff could supply the defendant with copies of all medical bills the plaintiff claims are related to the lawsuit. The plaintiff would then request that the defendant admit that the bills are genuine, the services listed on the bill were necessary to diagnose and/or treat the plaintiff’s injuries, and that the charges were reasonable. This helps the plaintiff narrow down which injuries and corresponding medical treatment the defendant is admitting and what the plaintiff will have to prove through expert testimony.

Limits and Objections to Request for Admission 

In Virginia, each party can send no more than 30 requests for admission total, including subparts of questions, that are not related to whether a document is authentic/genuine. There is no limit to the number of requests for admission related to whether a document is genuine (unless the court issues a protective order to protect the responding party).

Conclusion 

Parties can object to admitting or denying requests for admission if the request meets a disqualifying circumstance, such as if it violates lawyer-client privilege or asks for information that is irrelevant to the case. Your personal injury attorney will work with you throughout the process to help you understand what you do and do not have to disclose to the defendant during discovery.

Next, we talk about one final discovery tool: medical examinations.

Our Attorneys
Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Your search for representation should end here. I was badly injured as a pedestrian in a motor vehicle collision. I had no idea what to do next. I was referred to Curcio Law where Tom Curcio and his team were professional, attentive, caring, and kind...

    Read more

    Joseph Witkowski

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I was involved in a car accident recently. My husband and I met Justin Curcio and we discussed the car accident and he went over our auto insurance to determine what the best course of action would be with our cases. He made a very stressful situatio...

    Read more

    Oanh Tran

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    My attorney, Rakin Hamad, ESQ, led me through this process with compassion and patience. He listened and helped me with my many questions. I highly recommend Curcio Law! Thank you for helping me through a stressful time with so much professionalism a...

    Read more

    Carolyn

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in a traumatic brain injury and a stroke. The Curcio Law Team did a fantastic job representing me and resolving my case. Mr. Hamad's legal expertise in personal injury was evident in all inte...

    Read more

    Beth Folz - QT3K

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    By far the most stressful situation I have been in became the least stressful just because of the help and support i received from Justin at Curcio Law! Highly recommend!! Thank you again for all your help

    Read more

    Katherine Gomez

See all reviews
Awards & Memberships
  • Three best rated
Settlements & Verdicts
  • "$213,000.00 Jury Verdict, Auto Accident, Hand injury"

  • "$1,500,000.00, Auto Accident, Wrongful Death"

  • "$100,000.00, Auto Accident, Broken Leg"

  • "$493,000.00, Auto Accident, Brain injury, broken rib, facial lacerations"

  • "$190,000.00, Auto Accident, Brain injury"

Contact us

Quick Contact Form